Menu
Our extensive experience in international arbitration processes enables us to successfully address the most complex dispute resolutions, before any arbitration institution or fora, regardless of the applicable law.
We have developed expertise in international arbitration and litigation in cases of corporate disputes, trade, public procurement, maritime transportation, and fishing worldwide, representing both public and private clients.
In this context, we have acted in several cases before various arbitration tribunals, including proceedings in different jurisdictions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).
Representation of PESCANOVA GROUP/PESCAFINA in an international arbitration concerning a dispute related to cargo at the port of La Havana (Cuba) against LASKARIDIS SHIPPING Group.
Representation of HIOLLE INDUSTRIES SA in an international arbitration proceeding before the ICC in Paris against the Saudi agro-food group SAVOLA for breach of the turnkey construction contract entered into with ALEXANDRIA SUGAR COMPANY LTD, for the construction of a sugar factory in Alexandria, Egypt.
Acting as Agent and Counsel for the Republics of Malta, Panama, Seychelles, Guinea-Bissau, and the Marshall Islands, defending their interests in maritime disputes before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Permanent Court of Arbitration.
Representation of Malta pursuant to Article 287 of UNCLOS. The dispute concerned the arrest of a Maltese-flagged vessel, Duzgit Integrity, in the waters of São Tomé and Príncipe.
At our law firm, we offer specialized litigation services in Spain before various judicial authorities. We focus on representing businesses and individuals in complex and challenging cases before courts and tribunals at all levels.
Our attorneys have extensive experience in litigation related to various areas of law, including Civil, Commercial, and Administrative Law. We take pride in being a highly specialized law firm in the field of Spanish Law, and we are dedicated to providing our clients with high-quality service and a personalized approach.
Our lawyers have extensive experience in litigation related to European Union legislation, including matters related to competition law, preliminary rulings, legislative action, subsidies, customs law, cartels, or abuse of dominant position, among others. We take pride in being a highly specialized law firm in the field of European law, and we are dedicated to providing our clients with high-quality service and a personalized approach.
The General Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union are two of the most important institutions of the EU and can be invaluable resources for clients seeking to assert their rights in the European context.
With over 50 cases led by Ramón in these European courts, we have represented various clients in a wide variety of litigation across different sectors. Among our most notable cases are the representation of Valencia CF in a cassation case, as well as the representation of the General Council of Procurators of Spain in a preliminary question before the CJEU.
Here are some of the clients we have had the honor and opportunity to defend before the European Courts: Enso Española SA, Sogecable SA, National Federation of Scientific, Medical, Technical, and Dental Instrumentation Companies (FENIN), Federation of Fishermen’s Guilds, Organization of Producers of Frozen Tuna (OPTUC), Eduardo Vieira, SA, Vieira Argentina, SA, and Pescanova, SA, or Astipesca SL.
Legal representation for the General Council of Procurators of Spain. We have been providing legal counsel on European Law matters for years, more recently in opposing the submission of various preliminary questions before the CJEU.
Representation of Valencia Club de Fútbol before the EU courts in the annulment of a decision regarding alleged State aid from 2016 (SA.36387). Of particular significance was the strategy and success in applying interim measures that prevented the payment of certain amounts, which we later demonstrated would have been unjust.